Python：设计哲学

wiki/dev/Python/文化/设计哲学.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+---
+title: 设计哲学
+description: Python 的设计哲学
+keywords:
+- Python
+- 设计哲学
+tags:
+- Python
+sidebar_position: 2
+author: 7Wate
+date: 2022-10-18
+---
+
+```python
+# 运行此语句
+# 控制台输出显示 Python 之禅
+import this
+```
+
+## The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
+
+Python 之禅，蒂姆·彼得斯 (Tim Peters)
+
+Beautiful is better than ugly.
+
+优美优于丑陋；
+
+Explicit is better than implicit.
+
+明了优于隐晦；
+
+Simple is better than complex.
+
+简单优于复杂；
+
+Complex is better than complicated.
+
+复杂优于繁杂；
+
+Flat is better than nested.
+
+扁平优于嵌套；
+
+Sparse is better than dense.
+
+稀疏优于稠密；
+
+Readability counts.
+
+可读性很重要！
+
+Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. Although practicality beats purity.
+
+特例亦不可违背原则，即使实用比纯粹更优。
+
+Errors should never pass silently. Unless explicitly silenced.
+
+错误绝不能悄悄忽略，除非它明确需要如此。
+
+In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
+
+面对不确定性，拒绝妄加猜测。
+
+There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
+
+任何问题应有一种，且最好只有一种显而易见的解决方法。
+
+Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
+
+尽管这方法一开始并非如此直观，除非你是荷兰人。
+
+Now is better than never. Although never is often better than *right* now.
+
+做优于不做，然而不假思索还不如不做。
+
+If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
+
+很难解释的，必然是坏方法。
+
+If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
+
+很好解释的，可能是好方法。
+
+Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
+
+命名空间是个绝妙的主意，我们应好好利用它。